This talk was presented by Scott Ritchie, but he had to present material sent to him from Software Improvements. To his dismay, he found out at the last minute that SoftImp was moving away from OpenSource.
Notes from SoftImp's materials:
-apathy vs trust -electors don't care about code -trust is implicit -apathy -people don't want to know about flaws -people don't know how system works anyway -paper trails useless because at the end, you'd have to count paper -> improve counting method/accuracy instead -considerations -must be provably correct (i.e. not tampered with after deployment) -trustworthy developers -unreasonable deadlines -"controlled open source" -read-only, -only to those authorized, -no copying, -limited reads, self destructs -"hidden keys"
Notes from Scott's commentary:
-fork old GPL code? -in CA, paper trail required (Diebold machines decertified) -not a technological problem, a procedural, social problem -What's the social construct that caused these issues? -in Australia, voting is mandatory
Posted Tue, February 1, 2005 02:00 by online poker
Please check out some helpful info dedicated to online poker online casino phentermine
[moderate]